something you can just dream about in windows/mac I even like the (hated, but meanwhile optional) multi-window mode, because i work with multiple screens and have an excellent window manager. The most employers, clients and colleagues learned PS for years and they'll probably will continue even if they had to sell their soul to Adobe. Not because i can't do the same tasks with it, no because it's realy hard to deal with people who just won't accept So, I work with Gimp because i want to, and i work with PS because i sadly have to. This is the main reason i prefer Gimp, whenever it is possible. The fact that it is open source prevents itįrom becoming dependent to the arbitrariness of one company.
Gimp photo editor review 2016 software#
Gimp is not a complete stand-alone replacement for Photoshop, but combined with the right plugins and other software it can be equally powerful. Most schools/universitys you have PS-only-based courses, so that even you people who have to learn something new from start just inherit the binding to this restrictive, non-open and anticompetitive The big problem is: PS has become some kind of monopolized, privatized Standard so they can bind their users/customers even with a annoying licence policy and prices that are ridiculous/insane.
Operating concept? A Difference that also could confuse a experienced Gimp user who tries the same function in PS for the first time. Did you ever thought that the "strange" behavior of Gimp in your example is just part of a different "open with." dialog in Gimp would be a nice gimmick but I think there are more important and necessary things to improve.Ībout the Hue/Saturation thing: I think the main Problem is that some Gimp users and even developers were/are believing and proclaiming that Gimp is or should be equal to PS, also in the handling.īut there are differences, and it's not always because PS is more ergonomic or better than Gimp. And they let me open the file(s) directly with Gimp. Anyway, I never used the "open with." dialog of Gimp, because I have a goodįile manager and/or image viewer which is perfectly able to show multiple previews at once, edit tags, etc. Because on my OS (Ubuntu) i have Access to external drives in the open dialog. I don't wanna be offensive, but I think your comparison of these two programs lacks of equal experience in working with both of them. I know Photoshop and Gimp and work with both of them since years. I got plenty of time to take this screenshot during that GIMP was processing the image line by line with the hue on my picture. Speed processing of GIMP, do i really need to speak about this? By just looking at the screenshot above, youĬan see how slow it was. Icon you want to use and you need to click again in the picture you are editing to get the tool to appear. i tried all the tools and all are the same way! You click on the tool
Want to edit (the picture itself), and a miracle happen, the little window with the hue and saturation tools appeared. Puzzled i click on another tool, still nothing, click back on Hue and saturation.
You bet ? you loose ! because there is no window at the back too! Nothing happen, so i thought that the little window with the hue and saturation tools was opened at the back of the main window, search at the back. nothing happen, click one more time, still In an other hand with GIMP, i clicked on the Hue/Saturation and.
0 kommentar(er)
